Collection

Revenue collected by the Department includes tax, additional tax, surcharge and fines. Schedules 16 and 17 provide details of additional tax, surcharge and fines imposed by the Department in respect of earnings and profits tax during 2007-08.

Collection of Tax
There are various payment methods that a taxpayer can choose to settle his tax liability, including electronic payments (by phone, bank ATM or the Internet), payment in person or payment by post. Electronic tax payments have been well received by the public. For earnings and profits tax, 56% of the payment transactions in 2007-08 were made through electronic means, representing a modest increase of 1% over last year. Figure 28 shows the respective percentages of the different payment methods used by taxpayers under earnings of profits tax and total revenue.


Figure 28   Payment methods
Earnings & profits tax
This is a bar-chart showing analysis of payment transactions for earnings & profits tax by payment methods for 2006-07 and 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
In 2006-07, the number of transaction is 2,415,425, 11% paid by ATM, 17% by phone, 27% via Internet, 34% in person and 11% by post,
In 2007-08, the number of transaction is 2,471,224, 10% paid by ATM, 17% by phone, 29% via Internet, 33% in person and 11% by post.   This is a bar-chart showing analysis of collections from earnings & profits tax by payment methods for 2006-07 and 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
In 2006-07, total collections are $115,317.6 million, 3% paid by ATM, 3% by phone, 16% via Internet, 62% in person and 16% by post,
In 2007-08, total collections are $133,729.4 million, 2% paid by ATM, 2% by phone, 14% via Internet, 67% in person and 15% by post.
 
Total revenue (including other duties)
This is a bar-chart showing analysis of payment transactions for total IRD collections (including other duties) for 2006-07 and 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
In 2006-07, the number of transaction is 4,071,600, 7% paid by ATM, 11% by phone, 17% via Internet, 55% in person and 10% by post,
In 2007-08, the number of transaction is 4,341,130, 6% paid by ATM, 10% by phone, 20% via Internet, 55% in person and 9% by post.   This is a bar-chart showing analysis of total IRD collections (including other duties) by payment methods for 2006-07 and 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
In 2006-07, total collections are $155,101.4 million, 2% paid by ATM, 2% by phone, 12% via Internet, 64% in person and 20% by post,
In 2007-08, total collections are $200,696.5 million, 1% paid by ATM, 2% by phone, 9% via Internet, 72% in person and 16% by post.
By ATM   By Phone   Via Internet   In Person   By Post

Back to Top

Refund of Tax
Refunds were made to taxpayers for various reasons, such as overpayment of tax or revision of an assessment. Owing to the waiver of 2006-07 salaries tax and tax under personal assessment, both the number and amount of refunds made in 2007-08 have increased as compared with the previous year. Around 430,000 tax refund cases totalling $7.3 billion were made, representing an increase of 15% in the number of cases and 6% in the amount of refunds (Figure 29).

Figure 29   Tax refunds
    2006-07   2007-08  
  Type of tax Number   Amount
($m)
  Number   Amount
($m)
 
  Profits tax 29,900   3,732.0   29,838   3,642.9  
  Salaries tax 292,934   1,732.2   346,314   2,025.7  
  Property tax 15,002   123.7   15,335   149.6  
  Personal assessment 23,970   215.4   25,655   255.5  
  Others
15,370
 
1,082.7
 
15,276
 
1,258.5
 
  Total
377,176
 
6,886.0
 
432,418
 
7,332.2
 

Back to Top

Recovery of Tax in Default
Taxpayers should pay tax on or before the due date shown on the demand notes issued to them. The vast majority of taxpayers settle their tax liabilities in a timely manner.

A late payment surcharge of 5% will generally be imposed where tax is in default. If tax debts remain outstanding for more than six months after the due date, the Department may impose a further surcharge of 10% on the total unpaid amount.

Any tax in default is immediately recoverable. Recovery notices can be issued to third parties (including employers, bankers and other parties owing money to or holding money on behalf of the defaulting taxpayers) to effect collection. Actions may also be commenced in the District Court. Figure 30 summarises the recovery actions taken by the Department. Upon entry of judgment, a defaulting taxpayer becomes liable to legal costs and interest on judgment debt for the period from the date of commencement of proceedings to the date of full settlement in addition to the outstanding tax. Figure 31 shows the legal costs and judgment interest collected during 2007-08.

Figure 30   Recovery action
Recovery notices
This is a line-chart showing number of recovery notices issued for 2004-05 to 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
2004-05 is 100,558,
2005-06 is 96,572,
2006-07 is 94,960,
2007-08 is 97,410.   This is a bar-chart showing tax involved for recovery notices issued for 2004-05 to 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
2004-05 is $4,991 million,
2005-06 is $5,265 million,
2006-07 is $7,181 million,
2007-08 is $9,121 million.
 
Recovery actions in the District Court
This is a line-chart showing number of recovery actions in the District Court for 2004-05 to 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
2004-05 is 12,078,
2005-06 is 11,027,
2006-07 is 9,832,
2007-08 is 9,298.   This is a bar-chart showing tax involved for recovery actions in the District Court for 2004-05 to 2007-08.
The figures are as follows:
2004-05 is $856 million,
2005-06 is $919 million,
2006-07 is $931 million,
2007-08 is $1,127 million.

Figure 31   Legal costs and judgment interest collected in 2007-08
    $   $  
  Court cost        
 
    Court fees
2,702,031      
 
    Execution fees
46,560
  2,748,591  
  Fixed cost     1,125,492  
  Judgment interest        
 
    Pre-judgment interest
6,716,634      
 
    Post-judgment interest
29,311,154
 
36,027,788
 
  Total costs and interest collected    
39,901,871
 

A person with tax in default may be prevented from leaving Hong Kong. This, however, requires the Commissioner to satisfy a District Judge that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person intends to depart, or has departed, from Hong Kong to reside elsewhere without paying his tax or furnishing adequate security for payment of such tax, for his issuance of the "departure prevention direction". The relevant legislation also provides that the person concerned may appeal to the Court of First Instance of the High Court against a District Judge's decision.

Back to Top