 |
Tax Information :
Status of Tax Cases
Status of Tax Cases as at 31 December 2011
| ( Note : |
Headnotes of judgements not available in
respect of "cases not yet finalized") |
Cases Finalized Pending Publication
or Cases Not Yet Finalized :-
Relating to Inland Revenue Ordinance
Cases finalized, pending publication :-
| Taxpayer's Name |
Issues under Appeal |
Court |
Current Position |
|
Whether personal
assessment was validly issued. |
CFI |
By a judgment
dated 4 January 2010, the Taxpayers' appeal was dismissed
by CFI. |
Yue Yuen Group(8 subsidiaries of Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings)
Limited
[HCAL
49/2009]
|
Judicial review
application in respect of alleged ultra vires assessments,
failure to issue determinations within a reasonable time,
ultra vires and/or unlawful decision on standover of tax. |
CFI |
By a judgment
dated 17 March 2010, the Taxpayers' application to quash the
relevant assessments and the Commissioner's holdover decisions
was refused. An order was made by CFI that the Commissioner
determines the objections as soon as possible and at the latest
within 6 months from the date of the judgment. The Taxpayers
filed an appeal to CA, which was scheduled to be heard on
14 September 2010. However, the appeal was dismissed on 9
June 2010 by way of a joint application of the Taxpayers and
the Commissioner. |
|
Judicial review
application in respect of the Commissioner's decision ordering
that the tax could be held-over on the condition that a tax
certificate be purchased under Section 71 of the IRO. |
CFI |
Judicial review
was heard on 7 September 2010. The Taxpayer's application
was dismissed on 20 September 2010.
For details of the headnote, please click
here.
|
|
Whether share
option gains derived by the Taxpayer should be assessed to
tax. |
CA |
Judgment was
issued by CFI on 28 April 2006. The Commissioner's appeal
was allowed. |
Appeal by Liquidator of Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Limited
[CACV
285/2009]
|
Rejection by one of the joint and several liquidators of
the Taxpayer of the Commissioner's proof of debt in respect
of unpaid Profits Tax.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCCW 471/2005]
|
CA |
By a decision
dated 17 December 2009, the Commissioner's appeal under Rule
95 of the Companies (Winding-Up) Rules was allowed. Liquidator's
appeal to CA was dismissed by a judgment dated 13 July 2010. |
Mrs Murad,
Barbara Ellen, Mrs Ward, Mona Frances, Mr Murad, Mark Basiem
and Mr Strickroot, John Carl, the executors of the estate
of the late Mr Murad, Mike M(formerly known as Mr Murad, Mohammad
Mutaz)
[CACV 275/2009] |
Chargeability of termination payment.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
1/2009]
|
CA |
By a judgment
dated 19 November 2009, the Taxpayer's appeal was dismissed
by CFI. The Taxpayer has withdrawn the appeal to CA. |
|
Offshore profits claim.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
8/2009]
|
CA |
By a judgment
dated 3 May 2010, the Commissioner's appeal to CFI was allowed.
The Taxpayer's appeal to CA was dismissed on 7 March 2011.
The Taxpayer's application for leave to appeal to CFA was
heard by CA on 5 May 2011 and was rejected. The Taxpayer's
application to CFA for leave to appeal was heard and dismissed
on 24 August 2011. |
|
Whether loss
from securities and share transactions should be deducted
under Personal Assessment.
[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA
11/2005]
|
CFA |
Judgment issued
by CFA on 31 January 2008. The Taxpayers' appeal was dismissed.
|
|
Lump sum received
upon termination of employment ¡V whether assessable.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
1/2008]
|
CFA |
Appeal leapfrogged
to CFI under Section 67 of the IRO. By a judgment dated 26
June 2008, the Taxpayer's appeal to CFI was partially dismissed.
The Taxpayer's subsequent appeal and the Commissioner's cross
appeal to CA were heard on 6 March 2009. By a judgment dated
30 October 2009, the Taxpayer's appeal was dismissed and the
Commissioner's cross appeal was allowed by CA. The Taxpayer's
appeal to CFA was heard on 17 & 18 January 2011. On 1
February 2011, CFA handed down its judgment dismissing the
Taxpayer's appeal.
For details of the headnote, please click
here. |
Cases not yet finalized :-
| Taxpayer's Name |
Issues under Appeal |
Court |
Current Position |
|
Offshore profits
claim. The Taxpayer applied under Section 69(4) of the IRO
to have the case stated sent back to the Board of Review for
amendment. |
CFI |
By a judgment
dated 26 August 2011, CFI dismissed the Taxpayer's application
under Section 69(4) of the IRO. |
Lee Yee Shing,
Jacky & Yeung Yuk Ching
[CACV 49/2011] |
Judicial review on case stated procedure.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCAL
40/2008]
|
CA |
Leave to apply
for Judicial Review was granted by CFI on 20 April 2009. The
Judicial Review was heard and dismissed by CFI on 18 January
2011 and 22 February 2011 respectively. The Taxpayers have
filed an appeal to CA against CFI judgment. The appeal is
scheduled to be heard on 14 & 15 March 2012. |
Aviation Fuel
Supply Company
[CACV 150/2011] |
Taxability of a lump sum payment ¡V capital or revenue receipt.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
6/2009]
|
CA |
By a judgment
dated 8 July 2011, the Taxpayer's appeal was allowed by CFI.
On 5 August 2011, the Commissioner filed a notice of appeal
to CA. The Appeal is scheduled to be heard on 13 to 15 November
2012. |
Church Body
of the Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui[CACV 41/2010] |
Chargeability of share of profits.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
2/2009]
|
CA |
On 23 February
2010, the Taxpayers filed a notice of appeal to CA. Date of
hearing not yet set. |
Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Foundation
[CACV 41/2010]
|
Chargeability of share of profits.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
3/2009]
|
CA |
On 23 February
2010, the Taxpayers filed a notice of appeal to CA. Date of
hearing not yet set. |
Li & Fung (Trading) Limited
[CACV 86/2011]
|
Offshore profits claim.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
3/2010]
|
CA |
By a judgment
dated 18 April 2011, the Commissioner's appeal to CFI was
dismissed. On 16 May 2011, the Commissioner filed a notice
of appeal to CA. The hearing is scheduled to be heard on 14
& 15 February 2012. |
Nice Cheer Investment Limited
[CACV 135/2011]
|
Unrealized gain in respect of shares held for trading
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCIA
8/2007]
|
CA |
By a judgment
dated 28 June 2011, the Taxpayer's appeal was allowed by CFI.
On 26 July 2011, the Commissioner filed a notice of appeal
to CA. The hearing is scheduled to be heard on 22 & 23
May 2012. |
Chan Chun Chuen
[CACV 113/2011]
|
Judicial review
application in respect of the Commissioner's decision to reject
the late objection lodged
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCAL
76/2010]
|
CA |
The Commissioner
filed a notice of appeal to CA on 29 June 2011 against CFI
judgement dated 1 June 2011. The hearing is scheduled to be
heard on 28 February 2012. |
Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Limited (In Liquidation)
[CACV 64/2011]
|
Judicial review application on the Commissioner's refusal
to accept late objection under Section 64 of the IRO and
refusal to accept Section 70A claim.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCAL
29/2010 ]
|
CA |
By a judgment
dated 15 February 2011, CFI decided in favour of the Taxpayer.
The Commissioner filed a notice of appeal to CA. The hearing
is scheduled to be heard on 2 & 3 February 2012. |
Kong Tai Shoes Manufacturing Company Limited
[CACV 232/2011]
|
Judicial review application in respect of alleged ultra
vires assessments, failure to issue determinations within
a reasonable time, ultra vires and/or unlawful decision
on standover of tax.
[Previous CFI Case No. : HCAL
34/2011]
|
CFI |
By a judgment
dated 30 September 2011, the Applicant's application to quash
the relevant assessments and the Commissioner's holdover decisions
was refused. An order was made by CFI that the Commissioner
determines the Applicant's objections for 1998/99 to 2002/03
by 30 November 2011 and for 2003/04 to 2008/09 by 31 March
2012. The Applicant filed a notice of appeal to CA against
the judgment of CFI. The appeal is scheduled to be heard on
20 July 2012. |
Cases Finalized Pending Publication
or Cases Not Yet Finalized :-
Relating to Estate Duty Ordinance
Cases finalized, pending publication :-
| Taxpayer's Name |
Issues under Appeal |
Court |
Current Position |
- |
- |
- |
-
|
Cases not yet finalized :-
| Taxpayer's Name |
Issues under Appeal |
Court |
Current Position |
Deceased's name
JAN Yun-bor
[HCED 1/04]
Appellant
KAO Kim John
|
Whether payment from the deceased to her
son out of the proceeds of sale of her Taiwan property amounted
to gifts inter vivos. |
Court of First
Instance |
Date of hearing
not yet fixed. |
Deceased's name
CHAN Chi-cheong
[HCMP 1635/04]
Appellant
CHAN CHEUNG Suk-chun
|
Whether sums
allegedly being rental income collected by the deceased on
behalf of the appellant & others, and sums allegedly being
reimbursement of the various expenditures incurred for the
deceased, were deductible from the cash gifts received from
the deceased. |
Court of First
Instance |
Date of hearing
not yet fixed. |
Deceased's name
KUNG WONG Sau-hin
[HCED 1/11]
Appellant
KUNG Kwok-wai David
|
Whether the
assessed value of the deceased's interests in various private
companies, NT lots and estate of her predeceased husband was
excessive, and whether the debt due by the deceased in the
form of promissory note was deductible. |
Court of First
Instance |
Date of hearing
not yet fixed. |
Cases Finalized Pending Publication
or Cases Not Yet Finalized :-
Relating to Stamp Duty Ordinance
Cases finalized, pending publication :-
| Taxpayer's Name |
Issues under Appeal |
Court |
Current Position |
- |
- |
- |
-
|
Cases not yet finalized :-
| Taxpayer's Name |
Issues under Appeal |
Court |
Current Position |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
Note : You can print the Headnote
by using the Adobe Reader which is available free at the Adobe
Systems Incorporated website. |