Skip to main content
Skip to content
GovHK Trandition Chinese Simplified Chinese Background A A A Search Search Site Map Contact Us

Level Double-A conformance, W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

Web Accessibility Recognition Scheme
Mobile / Accessible Version IconMobile / Accessible Version Printer View IconPrinter View RSS Icon RSS
  Home > Tax Information - Individuals/Businesses > Status of Tax Cases

Status of Tax Cases

Status of Tax Cases as at 31 May 2017

( Note : Headnotes of judgements not available in respect of "cases not yet finalized")


Cases Finalized Pending Publication or Cases Not Yet Finalized:-
Relating to Inland Revenue Ordinance

Cases finalized, pending publication :-

Taxpayer's Name Issues under Appeal Court Current Position
King Global Investments Ltd

[HCIA 5/2016]

Chargeability of profits derived from sale of property.
CFI
By a judgment dated 10 February 2017, CFI refused the Taxpayer’s application for leave to appeal.
Turner Entertainment Networks Asia, Inc. for Muse Communication Co., Ltd

[CACV 259/2012]

Chargeability of licence fees received for granting the right to exhibit TV programmes outside Hong Kong and technical costs received for providing subtitled tracks for the TV programmes.

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA 4/2010]

CA
By a judgment dated 22 October 2012, CFI ruled that the licence fees, but not the technical costs, were chargeable to tax.  The Taxpayer appealed to CA on the chargeability of the licence fees.  By a judgment dated 28 May 2015, CA dismissed the Taxpayer’s appeal.
Good Mark Industrial Ltd

[CACV 90/2014]

Judicial review of the Commissioner’s refusal to accept the Taxpayer’s late application made under Section 70A.


[Previous CFI Case No.: HCAL 88/2012]

CA
By a judgment dated 3 February 2015, CA dismissed the Taxpayer’s appeal.  CA refused the Taxpayer’s application for leave to appeal to CFA.
Aviation Fuel Supply Company

[FACV 14/2013]

 

Taxability of a lump sum payment – capital or revenue receipt.

Balancing charges.

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA 6/2009]

[Previous CA Case No.: CACV 150/2011]

CFA
Appeal leapfrogged to CFI under Section 67 of the IRO. By a judgment dated 8 July 2011, CFI allowed the Taxpayer's appeal. The Commissioner appealed to CA on two alternative grounds : (1) the payment was of revenue nature; or (2) balancing charges be brought into account if the payment were a capital receipt. CA allowed the Commissioner to raise the issue regarding balancing charges but dismissed the appeal on 4 December 2012. The Commissioner appealed to CFA on the issue of balancing charges. On 15 December 2014, CFA handed down its judgment dismissing the Commissioner's appeal.

Cases not yet finalized :-

Taxpayer's NameIssues under AppealCourtCurrent Position
Crown Brilliance Ltd

[HCIA 1/2015]

Chargeability of profits derived from the sale of property.
CFI
By a judgment dated 14 October 2015, CFI allowed the Commissioner’s appeal and remitted the case to the Board of Review with its opinion thereon.
Pang Fai

[HCIA 2/2016]

Whether honorarium received by workshop facilitator and examination marker from a professional body should be assessed under Salaries Tax or Profits Tax.
CFI
By a decision dated 6 February 2017, the Commissioner was granted leave to appeal by CFI.  The appeal will be heard on 20 September 2017.
Poon Cho Ming, John

[CACV 94/2016]

Whether payment in lieu of a discretionary bonus and gain realized by the exercise of share options vested upon termination of employment should be chargeable to Salaries Tax.

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA 2/2015]

CA
By a judgment dated 24 March 2016, CFI dismissed the Taxpayer’s appeal.  The Taxpayer’s appeal to CA was heard on 16 May 2017.
Perfekta Enterprises Ltd

[CACV 115/2017]

Whether an “Initial Payment” received under a property redevelopment agreement should be chargeable to Profits Tax.

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA 1/2016]

CA
By a judgment dated 27 April 2017, CFI gave favourable answers to the questions of law posed by CIR and unfavourable answers to those of the Taxpayer.  The Taxpayer has appealed to CA against the judgment.
Church Body of the Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui

[FACV 16/2015]

 

Chargeability of share of profits.

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA 2/2009]

[Previous CA Case No.: CACV 41/2010]

[Previous CFA Case No.: FAMV 11/2015]

CFA
By a judgment dated 11 September 2014, CA allowed the Taxpayer’s appeal and remitted the case back to the Board of Review to determine the date of change of intention.  After the grant of leave to appeal by CFA, the Commissioner appealed against the judgment.  The appeal to CFA was dismissed on 4 February 2016.  The order of remittal issued by CA would be followed.
Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Foundation

[FACV 16/2015]

Chargeability of share of profits.

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCIA 3/2009]

[Previous CA Case No.: CACV 41/2010]

[Previous CFA Case No.: FAMV 11/2015]

CFA
By a judgment dated 11 September 2014, CA allowed the Taxpayer’s appeal and remitted the case back to the Board of Review to determine the date of change of intention. After the grant of leave to appeal by CFA, the Commissioner appealed against the judgment. The appeal to CFA was dismissed on 4 February 2016. The order of remittal issued by CA would be followed.

 

  back to top


Cases Finalized Pending Publication or Cases Not Yet Finalized :-
Relating to Estate Duty Ordinance

Cases finalized, pending publication :-

Taxpayer's Name Issues under Appeal Court Current Position
-
-
-
-

Cases not yet finalized :-

Taxpayer's Name Issues under Appeal Court Current Position
Deceased's name

JAN Yun-bor
[HCED 1/04]
 

Appellants
KAO Kim John
 

Whether payment from the deceased to her son out of the proceeds of sale of her Taiwan property amounted to gifts inter vivos.
Court of First Instance
Date of hearing not yet fixed.
Deceased's name

KUNG WONG Sau-hin
[HCED 1/11]
 

Appellant
KUNG Kwok-wai David
 

Whether the assessed value of the deceased's interests in various private companies, NT lots and estate of her predeceased husband were excessive, and whether the debt due by the deceased in the form of promissory note was deductible.
Court of First Instance
Date of hearing not yet fixed.
Deceased's name

TANG Wing-cheung 
[HCED 1/13]
 

Appellant
TANG Siu-wing and TANG Chui-yuk, Angela
 

Whether a promissory note payable to the deceased by a Hong Kong company was dutiable.
Court of First Instance
Date of hearing has been fixed on 9 to 11 August 2017.

 

  back to top


Cases Finalized Pending Publication or Cases Not Yet Finalized :-
Relating to Stamp Duty Ordinance

Cases finalized, pending publication :-

Taxpayer's Name Issues under Appeal Court Current Position
HO Kwok-tai

[CACV 52/2016]

Judicial review application on the Collector of Stamp Revenue’s decision to refuse partial refund of ad valorem stamp duty under section 29DF of the Stamp Duty Ordinance (Cap. 117)

[Previous CFI Case No.: HCAL 49/2015]

Court of Appeal
By a judgment dated 18 February 2016, the duty payer’s application for judicial review was allowed by the Court of First Instance.  The Collector of Stamp Revenue lodged an appeal with the Court of Appeal.  On 31 October 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down a favourable judgment allowing the Collector's appeal.
WONG Chak-sin

[DCSA 19/2014]

Whether the sale and purchase agreement for a residential property executed by a father for his daughter who was a minor should be chargeable to Buyer's Stamp Duty
District Court
By a decision dated 8 January 2016, the duty payer's appeal was dismissed.

Cases not yet finalized :-

Taxpayer's Name Issues under Appeal Court Current Position
-
-
-
-

 

 

back to top